Right to Access to Drinking Water
A Fundamental Right and also a Duty
of State under Article 21 to provide it to its Citizens: Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court has announced that right to access to
drinking water is basic and fundamental to life. It is the duty of the State to
provide clean drinking water to its citizens under Article 21 of the
Constitution. Justice Jayant Nath directed the Ministry of Defense, Ministry of
Urban Planning and GNCTD to hold a meeting for taking appropriate solution in
dealing with the status of the said colony within 4 months while handling the
petition filed by 53 retired army veterans for regularization of Defense
Service Enclave, that is considered by the Delhi Government as an unauthorized
colony. In addition, the bench also added that the petitioners could not be
denied basic facilities that include the right to access drinking water based
on the ground that they live in unauthorized colonies. Following that the court
directed the Delhi Jal Board to come up with a required scheme within 9 months
with regard to their normal procedure for supply of portable drinking water to
the petitioners in accordance with law.
BACKGROUND OF THE CASE
A group of
53 retired Armed Forces Personnel, veteran and war widows appealed to the High
Court requesting guidance on Union of India, Ministry of Defense and Ministry
of Urban Planning Development to supply all civic facilities to their servants
and agents that are properly obtainable by other citizens who own land in the
NCT of Delhi. The basic facilities include the right to supply of water, sewage
connection, drainage system, roads and security etc. The petitioners also
requested for appropriate directions from the Court regarding the respondents
to declare the Defense Service Enclave, an area allotted to these people,
inclusive of the Master Plan of Delhi, 2020.
The origin
of this case begins in 1961. At that time the petitioners were to be allotted
residential facilities according to a scheme formulated by the then Defense
Minister, VK Krishna Menon. Yet the government had purchased lands in the
Revenue Estate of Khanpur and Khirkee due to non availability of land. These
lands were not notified earlier as urban areas in 1966. So in accordance to the
petitioners, they were paying taxes to the Municipal Corporation, Delhi at
urban rates. They even professed that in spite of their repeated attempts since
past 30 years, the MCD failed to provide then even a single facility under the
ground that the Defense Service Enclave is an unauthorized colony. Such an act
is illegal and arbitrary.
Timeline of events
● 2002: A writ petition was filed by
the petitioners before the Delhi HC seeking regularization of unauthorized
colonies.
● 2003: Affidavit was filed by the
Ministry of Defense wherein it had cleared that the lands the lands were given
to the Society for construction of residential houses for residential purpose
so that the Armed Forces are able to rehabilitate themselves in a proper and
official manner in terms of the Army Order of May 1961.
● February 2010: Ministry of Urban
Development had submitted that a policy decision would be taken by the end of
2010 to regularize unauthorized colonies including public and private land in
Defense Service Enclave and parts of Sainik Farms.
● March 2010: Delhi Jal Board had
assured the court the acute shortage of water would be solved.
● 2014: Another writ petition was
filed by the petitioners seeking affirmation of authorized status as a
government approved scheme initiated in 1961 and to issue instructions to all
authorities for providing basic facilities.
● April 2018: Representations were
made by the petitioners to Municipal Corporation South Delhi and Delhi Jal
Board in order to grant them the required facilities however the same went
unanswered.
● 2018: This writ petition was filed
in the HC.
Grounds of the Petitioners
1. In spite of years of assurance given
by the respondents, not a single step has been taken in providing relief to the
petitioners.
2. Many dwelling units that were built
with lime and mortar only because of cement control became old, Hence they are
in urgent need of repairs.
3. Poor infrastructure including the
leakage in roofs and cracking of floors.
4. The authorities including the local
police are not allowing the petitioners to repair/build their boundary walls.
5. Petitioners are being denied the
basic facilities and the right to lead a happy life with dignity.
Stand of the Respondents
The
Defense Services Enclave is recognized as one of the unauthorized colonies
amongst the 1639 colonies, in accordance with the Delhi Jal Board, which
happens to be in the list maintained by the NCT of Delhi. There was also an
argument that the colony belongs to the category of "unauthorized affluent
colony" and many occupants there are not necessarily ex servicemen but are
also normal buyers.
The stand
of the Ministry of Urban Development is that the resolution that is sought by
the petitioners is the same as the 2014 writ petition. Hence the present writ
petition could not be maintained. They also proposed that the colony in
question is an unauthorized colony and with regard to the regulations for
regularization of unauthorized colonies, the orders for regularization must be
issued by Govt. of NCT of Delhi. They also have to coordinate and supervise the
whole regularization process.
COURT'S RULING
On
Regularization of Unauthorized Colony
The bench
while observing the judgment of the High Court in the prior petitions filed in
the years 2002 and 2010 held that the petitioners belonged to a different class
of person and cannot be termed as "affluent persons". They also
looked through the stand of the respondents on the before occasions, especially
the 2003 affidavit filed by the Ministry of Defense that said a policy decision
would be taken for regularizing the colonies. Yet the bench noticed that
nothing had been done.
The bench
also said that:"I also cannot help noticing that the petitioners are all retired
defense personnel who have devoted the most productive period of their lives
defending the nation's borders and performing other dangerous and difficult
tasks normally performed by defense service officers."
Finally in
the current view of this, the bench directed the respondents, Ministry of
Defense, Ministry of Urban Development and NCT of Delhi to hold a meeting of
functionaries who can take decisions according to the directions of the court.
"The said Committee so constituted by the Secretary, respondent No. 1 is
requested to take an appropriate decision as spelt out herein as per law
expeditiously preferably within four months from today. The decision so taken
shall be duly communicated to the petitioners." The bench held.
On Right
to Access of Drinking Water and Basic Amenities
The Court
counted on the case of A.P. Pollution Control Board II vs. Prof.M. V. Nayudu
(Retd.) & Ors., (2001) 2 SCC 62. It was convened that the right to have
access to clean drinking water is very basic to life and it is a duty of the
State under Article 21 to supply clean drinking water to its citizens.
Hence it
was announced that the petitioners could not be deprived their right to access
to pure drinking water on the mere ground that it is an unauthorized colony.
"The petitioners have been residing in the said area for the last 50 years
and cannot continuously be deprived of this right to access to drinking and
portable water." The bench summoned.
The Court
directed Delhi Jal Board to come up with an appropriate scheme as per their
normal procedure to supply portable drinking water to all the petitioners
following the law. The scheme has to be framed and implemented efficiently
within 9 months.
Case Name:
Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Building Society Ltd. v. Union of India &
Ors.
Date of
Judgment: 11.01.2021
No comments:
Post a Comment