Time to have some footage. Below are the links of my press coverage
http://www.merinews.com/article/studyplacescom-launches-personality-profile-test/133524.shtml
http://www.dmanewsdesk.com/StudyPlaces.com_-8-2412-1.html
http://www.alootechie.com/node/584
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/investing-in-elearning-proves-to-be-lucrative/314400/
http://www.pressbox.co.uk/detailed/Education/StudyPlaces.com_A_unique_web_based_platform_for_career_counselling_education_information_search_a_186444.html
http://www.merinews.com/article/crack-the-cat-book-launched/155654.shtml
http://www.india-now.net/artdisplay.aspx?cat_id=263&art_id=19277
http://www.blogcatalog.com/directory/blogging/
Cheers
The idea here is to give best possible information to people around the globe in variuous subjects where I have some knowledge. THis would help them in taking informed decisions on their own and thus be the ceo of life.
Friday, February 26, 2010
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Sexual Harrasmant: How much Clothing is the reason
Hi guys,
I shall start this by sharing a personal thing and do not assume that I am sick. After 5 years of my marriage, I just saw that my wife wear blouses which shows her cleavage. I asked her a very innocent question , " is this because of some design issue" ( May be the blouses can't be stitched neck high" . She just smiled and told me that I am stupid.
Then I observed that just about every woman in my neighborhood wear these kind of blouses including my mother. The reason told by my wife is to arouse sexual feelings in Man. Very fair as pole can't erect on his own as it needs some kind of stimulus.
But then why the woman wear same kind of clothes i work places and then complian of sexual harassment. Don't you think like your husband, other Men shall also be aroused by seeing your cleavage or bare back or thighs underneath your short skirt.
When I shared this to some of my female friends, they told me that they have right to wear anything till they are comfortable. There is no consideration about making others uncomfortable.
We all in India and most of us have brought up seeing certain things. By wearing too much of revealing clothes, woman makes most of the men uncomfortable. Then they also expect them not to stare t their thighs or cleavages though they could have easily wore a top which doesn't show the cleavage. In other words, woman show you cleavege and then expect you t be totally self controlled. But if you are a husband , you are supposed to see that get arousal.
How difficult is the life of Man in this woman's world.
I shall start this by sharing a personal thing and do not assume that I am sick. After 5 years of my marriage, I just saw that my wife wear blouses which shows her cleavage. I asked her a very innocent question , " is this because of some design issue" ( May be the blouses can't be stitched neck high" . She just smiled and told me that I am stupid.
Then I observed that just about every woman in my neighborhood wear these kind of blouses including my mother. The reason told by my wife is to arouse sexual feelings in Man. Very fair as pole can't erect on his own as it needs some kind of stimulus.
But then why the woman wear same kind of clothes i work places and then complian of sexual harassment. Don't you think like your husband, other Men shall also be aroused by seeing your cleavage or bare back or thighs underneath your short skirt.
When I shared this to some of my female friends, they told me that they have right to wear anything till they are comfortable. There is no consideration about making others uncomfortable.
We all in India and most of us have brought up seeing certain things. By wearing too much of revealing clothes, woman makes most of the men uncomfortable. Then they also expect them not to stare t their thighs or cleavages though they could have easily wore a top which doesn't show the cleavage. In other words, woman show you cleavege and then expect you t be totally self controlled. But if you are a husband , you are supposed to see that get arousal.
How difficult is the life of Man in this woman's world.
Luck-The biggest Succuss Factor
Friends
For quite long, we have always seen and heard that the world is not fair. The most hardworking, honest and talented people keep struggling whereas some good for nothing chaps are found to be CEO's of very prestigious organizations.
Many reasons are discussed for this including right timing, right place at right timing, diplomacy, network, good connections, influential parents etc all contributing in establishing the above phenomenon.
Recently, we say the biggest case of pure luck to prove the title that only luck can override all fairness of the world.
The scenario is India Vs South Africa test series, test Match 1. Selectors know that Rahul and Yuvraj can't play to their replacements are Murli Vijay and Badrinath. As the match is happening in India, Srikanth decided to follow an Autralian model. As There was Duleep trophy final coming on same days and no dubt that Kartik would be warming benches in Nagpur, Selectors decided to give international dressing room exposure to a guy called Wridhimman Saha. Two days before match, there were concerms about Laxman so selectors called Rohit Shrama as back up. So the line up was decided as
Segwag, Gambhir, Murli Vijay, Sachin Tendulakar, Laxman/ Rohit, Badrinath, Dhoni and then 4 bowlers. Mithun and Saha are surely to sit out and the only suspense was the choice between Amit Mishra/ ojha.
Match moening and just about 15 minutes befre the toss, Rohit Sharma is injured ( or he never wanted to face Dteyn, god knows) and guess what, Mr Wridhimman saha made his test debut after playing first class cricket for only 2 years, scoring 1200 run at average of 35.
Though as expected, the bugger failed as a batsman and I realy do not know when he wud be again in 15 member team. But just Imagibe if he would have scored a 100. he would have been playing in 2nd test as a batsman and another 50 wouldhave made him a specialist batsman.
people like Badrinath, Rihit Sharma, Kaif, Pujara would hev waited for another 7 years to see Sehwag retiring before getting next chance.
So, my point is basically most of the top 0.001% people are same. Most of the IIM guys with 10 years of ex can be CEO's and can manage companies. The luck is some got that chance and some are still business analysts
Luck..What a Fuc_
For quite long, we have always seen and heard that the world is not fair. The most hardworking, honest and talented people keep struggling whereas some good for nothing chaps are found to be CEO's of very prestigious organizations.
Many reasons are discussed for this including right timing, right place at right timing, diplomacy, network, good connections, influential parents etc all contributing in establishing the above phenomenon.
Recently, we say the biggest case of pure luck to prove the title that only luck can override all fairness of the world.
The scenario is India Vs South Africa test series, test Match 1. Selectors know that Rahul and Yuvraj can't play to their replacements are Murli Vijay and Badrinath. As the match is happening in India, Srikanth decided to follow an Autralian model. As There was Duleep trophy final coming on same days and no dubt that Kartik would be warming benches in Nagpur, Selectors decided to give international dressing room exposure to a guy called Wridhimman Saha. Two days before match, there were concerms about Laxman so selectors called Rohit Shrama as back up. So the line up was decided as
Segwag, Gambhir, Murli Vijay, Sachin Tendulakar, Laxman/ Rohit, Badrinath, Dhoni and then 4 bowlers. Mithun and Saha are surely to sit out and the only suspense was the choice between Amit Mishra/ ojha.
Match moening and just about 15 minutes befre the toss, Rohit Sharma is injured ( or he never wanted to face Dteyn, god knows) and guess what, Mr Wridhimman saha made his test debut after playing first class cricket for only 2 years, scoring 1200 run at average of 35.
Though as expected, the bugger failed as a batsman and I realy do not know when he wud be again in 15 member team. But just Imagibe if he would have scored a 100. he would have been playing in 2nd test as a batsman and another 50 wouldhave made him a specialist batsman.
people like Badrinath, Rihit Sharma, Kaif, Pujara would hev waited for another 7 years to see Sehwag retiring before getting next chance.
So, my point is basically most of the top 0.001% people are same. Most of the IIM guys with 10 years of ex can be CEO's and can manage companies. The luck is some got that chance and some are still business analysts
Luck..What a Fuc_
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Are we really living in Democracy
Dear All,
In the recent past, MNS ( Maharashtra Nav Nirman Sewa) or Shiv sena actions have created a doubt in my mind about our freedom. I am wonderign these days do we really live in a free country.
As per the constitution, one of the fundamental rights are ' Right to Speech'. But be it Sachin Tendulkar, Aamir Khan or recently Shahrukh Khan, all have been targeted because they expressed their views in open.
They beat North Indians who are in Mumbai, burn public property and I am yet to see Bal Thackerey or Rak Thackrey behind the bars seriously. Going for a 2hr or one day picnic is fine but what about serious punishment.
Rahul Gandhi took an aggressive approach by telling them it were North Indian who saved Mumbai during 26/11 attack. That is 100% true. Why Shiv Sena do not object every non Marathi person living in Mumbai. They target only poor as they are easy prey and create a furore in their vote bank.
I used to be hard core BJP/ Shiv Sena supporter and a 100% Hindu by heart. But if a Muslim PM comes and take my country to 20% GDP growth and allows to me to keep my religion, I would welcome all muslims to come and rule by country.
God Saved India from MNS/ Shiv Sena
In the recent past, MNS ( Maharashtra Nav Nirman Sewa) or Shiv sena actions have created a doubt in my mind about our freedom. I am wonderign these days do we really live in a free country.
As per the constitution, one of the fundamental rights are ' Right to Speech'. But be it Sachin Tendulkar, Aamir Khan or recently Shahrukh Khan, all have been targeted because they expressed their views in open.
They beat North Indians who are in Mumbai, burn public property and I am yet to see Bal Thackerey or Rak Thackrey behind the bars seriously. Going for a 2hr or one day picnic is fine but what about serious punishment.
Rahul Gandhi took an aggressive approach by telling them it were North Indian who saved Mumbai during 26/11 attack. That is 100% true. Why Shiv Sena do not object every non Marathi person living in Mumbai. They target only poor as they are easy prey and create a furore in their vote bank.
I used to be hard core BJP/ Shiv Sena supporter and a 100% Hindu by heart. But if a Muslim PM comes and take my country to 20% GDP growth and allows to me to keep my religion, I would welcome all muslims to come and rule by country.
God Saved India from MNS/ Shiv Sena